Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Excluding livestock from farm dams enhances native biodiversity

dc.contributor.authorBell, Kristianen
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Maldwyn J.en
dc.contributor.authorLindenmayer, David B.en
dc.contributor.authorScheele, Ben C.en
dc.contributor.authorSmith, David G.en
dc.contributor.authorMalerba, Martino E.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T01:17:25Z
dc.date.available2025-05-23T01:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-15en
dc.description.abstractAmid a global biodiversity crisis and with over 50 % of the world's land dedicated to agriculture, solutions that enhance the biodiversity value of farmland are crucial. Fencing farm dams to prevent livestock access may provide numerous production and biodiversity benefits. However, we have limited information on the responses to fencing dams by various taxa, and its subsequent effect on community assemblages and ecosystem function. We investigated the impact of fencing farm dams on species richness, functional diversity, and community structure in a control-impact study in south-eastern Australia by comparing 20 fenced and 20 unfenced dams (40 dams total). We used a combination of in-person surveys, trail cameras, eDNA, and acoustic loggers to detect a wide range of fauna. We found significant differences in overall species richness, functional diversity and species composition between fenced and unfenced dams. Taxonomic groups including birds and mammals, and feeding guilds including carnivores and frugivores were more prevalent at dams that excluded livestock. Our results suggest that excluding livestock from farm dams preferentially benefits native species. At the species level, larger-bodied waterbirds such as dabbling ducks tended to prefer unfenced dams, while smaller woodland birds characteristic of nearby remnant woody native vegetation preferred fenced dams. We show that excluding livestock from farm dams has significant positive effects on biodiversity, ecosystem function and community structure.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was financially supported by philanthropic funding provided by BHP. Dr Malerba was supported by the Australian Government through the Australian Research Council (DE220100752).en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.issn0167-8809en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7284-629X/work/183658990en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-7025-2287/work/183659118en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-4766-4088/work/183661603en
dc.identifier.scopus86000539900en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000539900&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733750734
dc.language.isoenen
dc.provenanceThis is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.rights© 2025 The Authorsen
dc.sourceAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmenten
dc.subjectFarm damsen
dc.subjectFencingen
dc.subjectFunctional biodiversityen
dc.subjectLivestock exclusionen
dc.titleExcluding livestock from farm dams enhances native biodiversityen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationBell, Kristian; Deakin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationEvans, Maldwyn J.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationLindenmayer, David B.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationScheele, Ben C.; Fenner School of Environment & Society Academic, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationSmith, David G.; Sustainable Farms Initiatives, Fenner School of Environment & Society, ANU College of Systems and Society, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationMalerba, Martino E.; Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume386en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.agee.2025.109623en
local.identifier.pure1ccc9d96-9010-4cd8-939e-ce3320d91a81en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/86000539900en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167880925001550-main.pdf
Size:
4.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd