Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Enabling anticipatory governance of climate adaptation in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Wyborn, Carina
Alexandra, Carla
van Kerkhoff, Lorrae

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Like for many river basins around the world, climate projections foretell a hotter, drier future for the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB). If the most drastic scenarios play out, the current suite of economies, industries, and ecosystems is unlikely to remain viable in the coming decades. Such changes will stress already fractured decision-making processes, where institutions are working to regain trust in a highly contested policy sphere. The upcoming review and revision of the National Water Initiative (2004), the Water Act (2007), and the Murray–Darling Basin Plan (2012) provide an opportunity to address critiques that they currently do not adequately address climate change. In this paper, we analyse qualitative interviews with 42 experts from diverse sectors in the Basin–research, government, advocacy, and industry–to articulate the challenges associated with the governance of climate risks and adaptation in the MDB. We draw on the concept of anticipatory governance–distinguishing it from both adaptation governance and adaptive governance–to identify four governance transitions and three governance interventions that could be mobilised to address these challenges. We argue that governing the deep uncertainty of climate change requires moving beyond adaptive governance’s reactive learning to anticipatory governance that institutionalises foresight, redistributes power, and acts on plausible futures before thresholds are crossed.

Description

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Water Resources

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until