Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The value of water: a perspective from sub-Saharan Africa

dc.contributor.authorBjornlund, Henningen
dc.contributor.authorBjornlund, Vibekeen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-11T17:41:55Z
dc.date.available2026-06-11T17:41:55Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.description.abstractSustainable ecosystems are critical for food security and well-being in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Prioritization of the intensive production of water-hungry crops for export has detrimentally impacted ecosystems. Land uses should be less water-intensive to increase the volume and quality of water in rivers. Governments should allocate water based on the total value (economic, socioeconomic and environmental) that the water will generate from a use, including flow-on and long-term benefits. Most people in SSA face many challenges causing multi-dimensional poverty: insecure access to food, WASH services, housing, education and jobs. Hence, reducing water allocated for domestic food production and WASH services in favor of ecosystems might not always be wise in the short term. On this basis, we discuss the short and long-term benefits flowing from allocating water for four major uses: i) domestic food production and job creation to provide physical and economic access to sufficient nutritional food for a healthy and productive life; ii) WASH services, for a healthier, better educated and more productive population with economic access to food; iii) export commodity production, allocation to this purpose should be limited to commodities, which generates the highest number of jobs and export revenue for Africa per unit of water and allows more water to remain in rivers and lakes; and iv) sustainable ecosystems, the focus should be on ecosystems, which generates jobs and nutrition such as fisheries and tourism. We provide a conceptual framework of benefits to guide policymakers making tradeoffs between different uses when allocating scarce water.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent9en
dc.identifier.issn2521-7119en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-3341-5635/work/217155750en
dc.identifier.scopus85177161354en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733810902
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries39th IAHR World Congress, 2022en
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2022 IAHR.en
dc.sourceProceedings of the IAHR World Congressen
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africaen
dc.subjectThe value of wateren
dc.subjectWater allocation, Conceptual framework of benefitsen
dc.titleThe value of water: a perspective from sub-Saharan Africaen
dc.typeConference paperen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage3398en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage3390en
local.contributor.affiliationBjornlund, Henning; University of South Australiaen
local.contributor.affiliationBjornlund, Vibeke; University of South Australiaen
local.identifier.doi10.3850/IAHR-39WC2521716X2022828en
local.identifier.pureac313072-ed5c-44cc-9268-3bfb73c2c0c4en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85177161354en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads