Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Trauma center quality improvement programs in the United States, Canada, and Australasia

dc.contributor.authorStelfox, Henry T.en
dc.contributor.authorStraus, Sharon E.en
dc.contributor.authorNathens, Averyen
dc.contributor.authorGruen, Russell L.en
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Syed M.en
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Andrewen
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-01T14:42:04Z
dc.date.available2026-01-01T14:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare quality improvement (QI) programs of trauma centers in 4 high-income countries. Background: Injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in countries around the world, but patient outcomes vary among countries with similar systems of trauma care. Methods: We surveyed medical directors and program managers from 330 trauma centers verified by professional trauma organizations in the United States (n = 263), Canada (n = 46), and Australasia (Australia, n = 18; New Zealand, n = 3) regarding their QI programs. Quality indicators were requested from all centers that measured quality of care. Follow-up interviews were performed with 75 centers purposively sampled across 6 baseline criteria. Results: A total of 251 centers (76% response rate) responded to the survey, with a similar distribution across countries. Trauma centers in the United States were more likely than those in Canada and Australasia to report measuring quality indicators (100% vs 94% vs 93%, P = 0.008), using report cards (53% vs 33% vs 31%, P = 0.033) and benchmarking (81% vs 61% vs 69%, P = 0.019). Centers in all 3 regions primarily used hospital process and outcome measures designed to establish whether care was safe (98% vs 97% vs 75%, P = 0.008), effective (97% vs 97% vs 92% P = 0.399), timely (88% vs 100% vs 92%, P = 0.055), and efficient (95% vs 100% vs 83%, P = 0.082). QI programs were largely local in nature, used different criteria to identify patients under QI purview, and employed diverse quality indicators and improvement strategies. Few centers evaluated the effectiveness of their QI program. Conclusions: This study provides the first international comparison of trauma center QI programs and demonstrates broad implementation in verified trauma centers in the United States, Canada, and Australasia. Significant variation exists in how trauma centers perform QI activities. Opportunities exist for improving and standardizing QI processes.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent7en
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932en
dc.identifier.otherPubMed:22580945en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0001-8023-1957/work/167652369en
dc.identifier.scopus84863320218en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733801109
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceAnnals of Surgeryen
dc.titleTrauma center quality improvement programs in the United States, Canada, and Australasiaen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage169en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage163en
local.contributor.affiliationStelfox, Henry T.; Medicine and Community Health Sciencesen
local.contributor.affiliationStraus, Sharon E.; University of Torontoen
local.contributor.affiliationNathens, Avery; University of Torontoen
local.contributor.affiliationGruen, Russell L.; Monash Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHameed, Syed M.; University of British Columbiaen
local.contributor.affiliationKirkpatrick, Andrew; University of Calgaryen
local.identifier.citationvolume256en
local.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256c20ben
local.identifier.pure01affb37-7ec5-4407-8fc7-04e16acbbde5en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84863320218en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads