Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Harmony and Dissonance: The Interplay of Formal and Informal Social Protection

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Mumtaz, Zahid

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This blog is based on an article in Social Policy and Society by Zahid Mumtaz.  A sizeable segment of the global population, particularly in Global South nations, lacks access to state-provided formal welfare. Consequently, they rely on informal support to meet their needs. This informal assistance however – whether originating from family, non-kin relationships, friends, religious organisations, NGOs, or other sources – may not consistently meet recipients’ requirements. Similarly, in some instances state-provided formal welfare also falls short of addressing recipients’ needs. There are also scenarios where both informal and formal welfare systems inadequately cater to the requirements of individuals benefitting from both. It is thus imperative to explore the interaction between formal and informal welfare when recipients are exposed to both, determining relative effectiveness. Previous research on the interplay between formal and informal welfare has largely focused on the crowding-in and crowding-out hypothesis, which examines how formal welfare substitutes the use of informal welfare. In this study, 90 semi-structured interviews were conducted with households in 14 Pakistani cities. These households received both formal and informal welfare.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Social Policy Blog

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

abcd