Retrospective bulk density estimates from southeast Indian Ocean sediments: comparison of waterloss and chlorine-ion methods

dc.contributor.authorClemens, Steven C.en
dc.contributor.authorPrell, Warren L.en
dc.contributor.authorHoward, William R.en
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-31T23:30:24Z
dc.date.available2025-05-31T23:30:24Z
dc.date.issued1987en
dc.description.abstractKnowledge of absolute accumulation rates permits quantitative comparison between and within sediment components from cores of differing age and lithologic character. Dry bulk density is an essential parameter in the calculation of absolute accumulation rates. Dry bulk density measurements require a wet-volume term and are best made when a core is first recovered. Such measurements were not routinely made on Eltanin cores from the southeast Indian Ocean. In an effort to recover this information we have estimated the dry bulk density of sixty samples from five Eltanin cores using a water loss method and a chloride-ion method which is independent of the state of desiccation of the cores. Based on the consistency of the results using these two independent methods we feel confident in our estimation of dry bulk density. Comparison of dry bulk density and %CaCO3 allowed us to develop the following non-linear regression equation for estimating the dry bulk density based on %CaCO3, a more easily and accurately measured property: Dry bulk density = 0.00003104*(%CaCO3)2 + 0.002176*(%CaCO3) + 0.430 This equation can be used to estimate dry bulk density to within ± 0.097 g/cm-3 , thus providing the information needed to reliably calculate absolute accumulation rates. Our Indian Ocean dry bulk density equations are different from those developed by similar techniques for the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans indicating that different lithologies necessitate the development of regional equations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was conducted under the auspices of projecSPECt MAP, National Science Foundation grant number ATM-8319372 which is jointly supported by the Climate Dynamics and Submarine Geology and Geophysics programs. We would like to acknowledge Dennis Cassidy of the Florida State Antarctic Research Facility for providing us with specially extracted core samples curated under N.S.F. Division of Polar Programs contract number C-1059.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent14en
dc.identifier.issn0025-3227en
dc.identifier.otherRIS:urn:33A75F0BFD4135BBA7E11DD4C4BA1C1Cen
dc.identifier.otherRIS:62en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0003-0714-9994/work/184826649en
dc.identifier.scopus0023510973en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733756267
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights© 1987 The Author(s)en
dc.sourceMarine Geologyen
dc.titleRetrospective bulk density estimates from southeast Indian Ocean sediments: comparison of waterloss and chlorine-ion methodsen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage70en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage57en
local.contributor.affiliationClemens, Steven C.; Brown Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationPrell, Warren L.; Brown Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHoward, William R.; Brown Universityen
local.identifier.citationvolume76en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/0025-3227(87)90017-Xen
local.identifier.pure2d5b5e9c-ee8a-4d39-b7a2-f063a1499e7den
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0023510973en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads