Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The real price of health: a mixed methods study examining the influence of income on strategies used by people with chronic conditions to manage the out-of-pocket costs of health in Australia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Desborougha, Jane
Namsraia, Tergel
Huynha, Elisabeth
Parkinsona, Anne
Smith, Jillian Kingsford
Pramono, Andini
Butlera, Danielle
Butlera, Kamania
Hodsonb, Fiona
Ibrahima, Samar

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Introduction: People living with chronic conditions face a disproportionate financial burden in managing their health. Despite Medicare’s aim to ensure equitable access to health care and medicines, people with chronic conditions face high out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) and the burden is amplified by multimorbidity, which increases the frequency and range of health care needed. Aim: To investigate strategies people with chronic conditions use to manage the OOPC of health in relation to income and other demographic factors. Methods: A mixed methods study including: (1) semi-structured interviews (N = 57) and (2) a cross-sectional survey (N = 284) of people with chronic conditions exploring strategies used to manage the OOPC of health and comparing these across six income brackets: (1) $0–18,000, (2) $18,001–$45,000, (3) $45,001–$80,000, (4) $80,001–120,000, (5) $120,001–$180,000 and (6) >$180,000. Data were analysed using: (1) framework analysis and (2) comparative and multiple logistic regression models comparing income and adjusting for other demographics. Results: (1) Budgetary strategies, most often reported by people earning ≤$80,000, included foregoing basic necessities to afford health care, rationing medications or delaying care. (2) 82.5% of survey participants reported cutting back on health consultations due to OOPC, including GP, specialist, and allied health visits. Earning <$45,000/annum was significantly (5%) associated with making greater healthcare cutbacks compared to earning > $180,000. When comparing the effects of income and multimorbidity, multimorbidity had a larger impact on healthcare cutbacks (explaining 4.9% of the variance vs 2.3%), and when combined, they explained 10.9% of all healthcare cutbacks. Conclusion: These findings highlight the current burden of the OOPC of health care for people with chronic conditions in Australia. While income offers some buffers, it is insufficient in the face of growing multimorbidity and health care complexity. Policy responses must address groups affected by income and multimorbidity to address the cumulative burden experienced by people with chronic conditions

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Australian Journal of Primary Health

Book Title

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

abcd