No electrophysiological evidence for semantic processing during inattentional blindness

dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Brendan T.en
dc.contributor.authorJack, Bradley N.en
dc.contributor.authorPammer, Kristenen
dc.contributor.authorCanseco-Gonzalez, Enriquetaen
dc.contributor.authorPitts, Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-23T12:23:16Z
dc.date.available2025-05-23T12:23:16Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01en
dc.description.abstractA long-standing question concerns whether sensory input can reach semantic stages of processing in the absence of attention and awareness. Here, we examine whether the N400, an event related potential associated with semantic processing, can occur under conditions of inattentional blindness. By employing a novel three-phase inattentional blindness paradigm designed to maximise the opportunity for detecting an N400, we found no evidence for it when participants were inattentionally blind to the eliciting stimuli (related and unrelated word pairs). In contrast, participants noticed the same task-irrelevant word pairs when minimal attention was allocated to them, and a small N400 became evident. When the same stimuli were fully attended and relevant to the task, a robust N400 was observed. In addition to univariate ERP measures, multivariate decoding analyses were unable to classify related from unrelated word pairs when observers were inattentionally blind to the words, with decoding reaching above-chance levels only when the words were (at least minimally) attended. By comparison, decoding reached above-chance levels when contrasting word pairs with non-word stimuli, even when participants were inattentionally blind to these stimuli. Our results also replicated several previous studies by finding a “visual awareness negativity” (VAN) that distinguished task-irrelevant stimuli that participants noticed compared with those that were not perceived, and a P3b (or “late positivity”) that was evident only when the stimuli were task relevant. Together, our findings suggest that semantic processing might require at least a minimal amount of attention.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119en
dc.identifier.otherPubMed:39182710en
dc.identifier.scopus85203012308en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203012308&partnerID=8YFLogxKen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733752237
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsPublisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authorsen
dc.sourceNeuroImageen
dc.subjectAttentionen
dc.subjectConsciousnessen
dc.subjectInattentional blindnessen
dc.subjectN400en
dc.subjectP3en
dc.subjectPerceptionen
dc.subjectSemanticen
dc.subjectVisual awareness negativityen
dc.titleNo electrophysiological evidence for semantic processing during inattentional blindnessen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.contributor.affiliationHutchinson, Brendan T.; Vrij Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationJack, Bradley N.; Psychology Teaching, School of Medicine and Psychology, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationPammer, Kristen; University of Newcastleen
local.contributor.affiliationCanseco-Gonzalez, Enriqueta; Reed Collegeen
local.contributor.affiliationPitts, Michael; Reed Collegeen
local.identifier.citationvolume299en
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120799en
local.identifier.pure3370f217-eced-4ccd-b369-a2172b6267a3en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85203012308en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads