Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Philosophy of Technology & Aesthetic Cognitivism

dc.contributor.authorWittingslow, Ryanen
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-19T22:41:00Z
dc.date.available2026-06-19T22:41:00Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter I explore one way in which methods drawn from philosophy of technology can be used to meaningfully address open problems within the philosophy of art: in this case, how to speak meaningfully about the cognitive functions of artworks. I outline a model of the cognitive functions of artworks that is grounded in a theory of knowledge capable of accounting for non-propositional performances. Armed with this theory of knowledge, I argue that the cognitive function of artworks should not be understood either propositionally nor experientially, but instead in terms of the ‘affordances’—that is, the increase in performative capacities—that they provide. In diesem Kapitel untersuche ich eine Möglichkeit, wie Methoden aus der Technikphilosophie genutzt werden können, um offene Probleme innerhalb der Kunstphilosophie sinnvoll anzugehen: in diesem Fall, wie man sinnvoll über die kognitiven Funktionen von Kunstwerken sprechen kann. Ich skizziere ein Modell der kognitiven Funktionen von Kunstwerken, das auf einer Wissenstheorie beruht, die in der Lage ist, nicht-propositionale Leistungen zu berücksichtigen. Ausgerüstet mit dieser Erkenntnistheorie argumentiere ich, dass die kognitive Funktion von Kunstwerken weder propositional noch erfahrungsbezogen verstanden werden sollte, sondern stattdessen im Sinne der ‚Affordanzen‘ – d.h. der Steigerung der performativen Fähigkeiten –, die sie bieten.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-8487-7300-8en
dc.identifier.otherRIS:urn:6A0FF4030ED345DEAB776BA7C6B4F20Fen
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-6278-6489/work/217923226en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733811691
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNomos Verlagsgesellschaft (Nomos publishing house)en
dc.relation.ispartofKunst und Werken
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJahrbuch Technikphilosophieen
dc.titlePhilosophy of Technology & Aesthetic Cognitivismen
dc.typeBook chapteren
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage155en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage145en
local.contributor.affiliationWittingslow, Ryan; ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences, The Australian National Universityen
local.identifier.pure4b71be0b-ed75-4597-ac71-f940f629732een
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads