Challenging traditional methods of age estimation: elemental and isotopic characterisation of speartooth shark Glyphis glyphis vertebrae

dc.contributor.authorLewis, Hilaryen
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Michael I.en
dc.contributor.authorALARD, Olivieren
dc.contributor.authorKyne, Peter M.en
dc.contributor.authorHui-Qing, Huangen
dc.contributor.authorGréau, Yoannen
dc.contributor.authorHarry, Alastair V.en
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Grant Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorKirk, Amyen
dc.contributor.authorMahan, Brandonen
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-23T14:40:23Z
dc.date.available2025-12-23T14:40:23Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-16en
dc.description.abstractChondrichthyan (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) age estimation has mostly been informed through counting bands in calcified hard parts such as vertebrae. However, this method is not broadly applicable to all species and is prone to misinterpretation biases. There is a need to improve current age estimation methods, and elemental characterisation of vertebrae is a promising prospect. We analysed vertebrae from speartooth shark Glyphis glyphis, a euryhaline species from tropical Australia, by both micro-X-ray fluorescence (μXRF) and laser ablation multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to discriminate elemental and isotopic variations. Age estimates from μXRF were compared to the conventional ageing method of transmitted light optical microscopy (TLOM). In addition, we investigated ambient environmental changes along the growth axis of vertebrae through in situ characterisation of strontium (Sr) isotopic ratios (87Sr/86Sr) and conventional solution-based 87Sr/86Sr analyses of water samples from the associated habitat. Age estimation through μXRF indicated that Sr exhibits an alternative banding pattern to that of TLOM. This Sr variation is correlated to strong 87Sr/86Sr variations, not seen in stenohaline marine species. The elemental and isotopic Sr variation recorded along the growth axis of G. glyphis vertebrae is related to the influence of seasonal terrestrial runoff. The predictability of the seasonal rainfall pattern anchors 87Sr/86Sr to time and thereby validates Sr bands as annual (between ages 0-11) while it invalidates bands identified via TLOM. This study suggests that detecting elemental and isotopic variations with predictable seasonal fluctuations in a species’ ambient environment can provide an alternative means of age validation.en
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank the Save Our Seas Foundation for funding this study, and the Macquarie University GeoAnalytical Facilities and the Advanced Analytical Centre at James Cook University for facilitating analyses. We thank Dr. Alex McCoy-West for his assistance and knowledge that facilitated this study. For collection of samples used in this study, we thank Traditional Owners, field assistants, Australia Bay Seafood Company, Dr. Cassandra Rigby, Dr. William White, Dr. Leontine Baje, the Papua New Guinea National Fisheries Authority, and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. This study was funded by the Save Our Seas Foundation Small Grant #576. Glyphis glyphis sample collection was supported by the Marine Biodiversity Hub, a collaborative partnership supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program. Adelaide River water sample collection was funded and completed by P.M.K. This study was further supported by a grant from Australia and Pacific Science Foundation (APSF24035) to O.A. and H.M.K.L., and by a Future grant from the Australian National University to O.A.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.format.extent17en
dc.identifier.issn0171-8630en
dc.identifier.otherORCID:/0000-0002-8458-3746/work/194654708en
dc.identifier.scopus105020478461en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733797005
dc.language.isoenen
dc.sourceMarine Ecology Progress Seriesen
dc.titleChallenging traditional methods of age estimation: elemental and isotopic characterisation of speartooth shark Glyphis glyphis vertebraeen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublicationen
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage121en
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage105en
local.contributor.affiliationLewis, Hilary; Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, Townsvilleen
local.contributor.affiliationGrant, Michael I.; Universitas Hasanuddinen
local.contributor.affiliationALARD, Olivier; Geochemistry, Research School of Earth Sciences, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationKyne, Peter M.; Charles Darwin Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHui-Qing, Huang; Advanced Analytical Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australiaen
local.contributor.affiliationGréau, Yoann; Geochemistry, Research School of Earth Sciences, ANU College of Science and Medicine, The Australian National Universityen
local.contributor.affiliationHarry, Alastair V.; Western Australian Department of Fisheriesen
local.contributor.affiliationJohnson, Grant James; Department of agriculture and fisheries, Northern Territory Government, Notrthern Territory , Australiaen
local.contributor.affiliationKirk, Amy; Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoodsen
local.contributor.affiliationMahan, Brandon; The University of Melbourne, School of Geography, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences, Faculty of Science, Victoria 3010, Australiaen
local.identifier.citationvolume771en
local.identifier.doi10.3354/meps14986en
local.identifier.pure1dcf4a7d-8abe-4992-be55-57dce9bf9614en
local.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020478461en
local.type.statusPublisheden

Downloads