Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Can't see the “hood” for the trees: Can avian cooperative breeding currently be understood using the phylogenetic comparative method?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Cockburn, Andrew

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Academic Press Inc.

Access Statement

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Cooperative breeding in birds has traditionally been studied via long-term investigations of single populations. In the last two decades the phylogenetic comparative method has been applied to draw generalizations and make predictions about the global distribution of cooperative breeding. These studies generally test single causative factors and have attributed importance to slow life histories, the role of enemies, the way that lifetime fidelity facilitates kin selection, the benefits of help and helping when the climate fluctuates, and the advantages of continuing to live as families after young become nutritionally independent. Surprisingly, no analysis has focused explicitly on the role of the prohibition of dispersal by habitat saturation, the most frequently hypothesized explanation for cooperative breeding when these studies began. In this contribution I critically review this literature, and argue that it has failed to explain obvious phylogenetic and biogeographic patterns in the distribution of cooperation breeding. I identify several common flaws in the way that these studies have been conducted, and suggest that progress may depend on restructuring the question into several components. However, application of appropriate models is likely to fall foul of biases and deficiencies in the data available to populate the analyses, and I argue that a more collaborative, targeted and systematic approach to data collection may be necessary.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Advances in the Study of Behavior

Entity type

Publication

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until