Food insecurity in developing economies: Cambodian and international evidence
Abstract
The seriousness of food insecurity in many developing economies
has prompted this research into its key potential drivers. The
thesis assesses primary data on Cambodia as a case study to
examine potential impacts of (i) agricultural land property
rights on household food insecurity of rice farmers in rural
Cambodia, (ii) of excessive flooding and irrigation on rice
productivity and rice revenue, and (iii) of rice productivity and
rice revenue on household food insecurity. The primary data are
taken from a household survey conducted between March and May
2014, administered to 256 households in 32 rural villages in
rural Cambodia. The second part of the thesis examines (iv) the
international experience of private property rights impacts on
food insecurity, using data from 57 developing economies over
1990 to 2011. This cross-country examination is motivated by the
Cambodian evidence to investigate whether the international
evidence on the linkage exists.
The plot-level evidence from Cambodia indicates that a one-unit
increase in security in agricultural land property rights could
reduce household food insecurity by about 1 day per annum on
average. Security in agricultural land property rights could
improve credit access, collateralisation, and farmers’
revenue-cost ratios. For rural rice farmers in Cambodia, simply
holding ‘land documents’ of any type does not appear to have
a strong impact on their food insecurity. The international
evidence provides similar results to the Cambodian evidence:
countries with greater private property rights experienced less
food insecurity. A one-percent increase in property rights
security potentially reduces prevalence of undernourishment and
prevalence of food inadequacy by 0.85 percent and 0.64 percent on
average, respectively.
The plot-level evidence from Cambodia shows that providing
irrigation for the currently unirrigated plots could raise
per-harvest rice yield by about 0.7 tonnes and per-harvest rice
revenue by about USD150 on average. Expanding access to formal
irrigation, i.e., from reservoirs, dykes, or canals, could raise
rice yield and rice revenue by about USD200 per harvest, relative
to other irrigation types, such as river or groundwater
irrigation. The household-level evidence from Cambodia shows that
rice productivity and rice revenue are significantly, negatively
associated with household food insecurity. Plots affected by
excessive flooding had lower rice yield by about 0.7 tonnes per
hectare, lower per-harvest rice revenue by about USD150, or lower
per-hectare rice revenue by about USD140 on average, relative to
those plots unaffected by excessive flooding.
The thesis has identified four policy options for tackling food
insecurity in Cambodia and developing economies. First,
strengthening security in private agricultural property rights is
an option for reducing household food insecurity in rural
Cambodia. Relatedly, greater security in agricultural land
property rights would improve credit access and land-based
collateral use. Second, enhancing security in private property
rights in developing economies would be key for lowering their
national food insecurity. Third, expanding formal irrigation
access and is another option for improving rice production and
rice revenue. Fourth, strengthening mechanisms to cope with
excessive flooding in rice-producing areas in rural Cambodia is
key for improving rice production and rice revenue.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description