Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Marxism and the question of nationalism in a colonial context : the case of British India

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Seth, Sanjay

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This work examines how Marxism, a theory born in Europe, came to conceptualize Asia. It traces the ways in which Marxists theorised and engaged with nationalism in the colonies, and specifically, with Indian nationalism. It assesses the implications and consequences of this for Marxist theory. The first part of this work follows the process by which Asia came to be incorporated into Marxist theory. The manner of this incorporation was such that nationalism was declared to be the central theoretical and political issue in the colonies. The question of 'the East’ came to be treated, within Marxism, as 'the national and colonial question'. The second part examines how Marxists in India theorised and engaged with Indian nationalism. In seeking to understand Indian nationalism in Marxist terms, Indian communists also sought to define their own tasks and role, as communists, in relation to the nationalist movement. They sought to define the relationship between class struggle and nationalist struggle, and between the goal of national liberation and their own goal of socialism. In this part we examine the different answers they gave to these questions. Its 'engagement' with nationalism had certain consequences for Marxist theory. We conclude by suggesting that the manner of this engagement - one in which Marxists endorsed colonial nationalism, and then sought to harness class struggle to nationalist struggle, thereby failing at any point to develop a critique of the nation-state - resulted in Marxism itself becoming 'national'. Marxism, we conclude, is in its content, structure and intent a non-national, universal theory ; but it is also one which has come to identify the political project to which it is wedded with the nation. Marxism has become 'nationalist', in the sense that it has come to see in the nation-state the necessary form through which, and in which, other goals - such as democracy and socialism - are realised and embodied.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd