A comparative analysis of indigenous bilingual education policy and practice in Australia and Peru
Abstract
Australia and Peru are both signatories of the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which
asserts that indigenous peoples have a right to an education in
their own languages, and that States have an obligation to ensure
this is possible. Nevertheless, despite similarities in the
early histories of indigenous education and the emergence of
bilingual programs in the 1970s, the current language policy
situations differ greatly between the two countries. This thesis
seeks to explain the different outcomes of bilingual education
policies using the framework of language policy developed by
Spolsky, which conceptualises language policy as a
three-component system that operates within multiple domains and
functions in an ecological relationship with an array of
linguistic and non-linguistic factors. As such, it will examine
several areas of language management, ideology, and practices, as
well as the ecological context and the domains in which these
components of language policy take place. In doing so, the
thesis identifies areas in which the Australian policy situation
must change if it is to support bilingual education for
indigenous students in the future.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description