Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Reproducing exclusion or inclusion? Implications for the wellbeing of Indigenous Australian children

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Daly, A. E
Smith, Diane E

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University

Abstract

This paper is exploratory. It examines the analytic usefulness and practical implications of the concepts of ‘exclusion’ and ‘inclusion’ in a cross-cultural context. The focus is on the socioeconomic wellbeing of Indigenous children, in the context of the families and households in which they live. First, the current dimensions and trends of Indigenous children’s socioeconomic status are analysed using key indicators from the 2001 Census. Interpretive depth is given to that quantitative analysis by reference to the long-term ethnographic fieldwork and survey research conducted by the authors with Indigenous families in different communities. The paper demonstrates that, in terms of a ‘deficit model’ which emphasises exclusion, Indigenous children continue to be among the most socioeconomically disadvantaged children in Australia. The paper then proceeds to consider an alternative perspective which focuses on an ‘asset model’, emphasising Indigenous children’s inclusion and participation within their own culturally-based family, social and economic systems. Again, reference is made to qualitative and survey information. The paper concludes by exploring the implications for children of exclusion from one sphere of life (i.e. the mainstream economy), for their inclusion in the other (i.e. the Indigenous sphere). It suggests, perhaps somewhat provocatively, that contrary to commonly held assumptions which emphasise assimilatory outcomes, exclusion from mainstream economic participation may be actively undermining Indigenous families’ own capacity to reproduce culturally valued relationships and roles. If that is the case, then key aspects of Indigenous cultural wellbeing and social reproduction may be directly linked to breaking the cycle of intergenerational welfare dependency and economic exclusion that is being transmitted to Indigenous children.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd