Aspects of farm life in south west New South Wales between the two world wars
Abstract
This thesis investigates aspects of Australian rural
society in the period 1920-1939. It concentrates on a wheatgrowing
region of New South Wales which lies between Hillston,
Griffith, Temora, and Lake Cargelligo - the South West of the
State. Evidence for this study came from published government
documents, the local press, and unpublished governmental,
institutional, and private records of the period. Details of
these, and methodological problems associated with their use
are discussed in the introduction and in appendices.
The first section begins with an analysis of the
origins and experience of ex-soldiers and civilians who took
up farms in the region in the early and mid-1920s. Their 34°
parochial outlook was reinforced by their farm work, their
recreation, and by the local press. These forces also
combined to create a belief in rural independence which
co-existed with a contradictory expectation of government aid
as a matter of course. Although the local society accepted a
need for consensus in community relations which contributed
to the maintenance of social cohesion, its celebration in the
rural press did not reflect reality. The second part deals with the economic, social,
and political impact of the collapse of wheat prices in 1930/1.
This crisis for the wheat industry was accompanied by
"restriction of credit by both private and government agencies.
Farmers attempted to reduce their production costs and expenditures, and to increase their income by diversifying
their farms economy . Farmers families were also required
to do more to help the farm survive by doing more farm work,
and by helping to produce an income. The consequent 'making
do ' reduced, but did not destroy, local social life.
However, the stresses imposed by the crisis found
expression in community groups, new as well as old. The
farmers' impatience with governments, particularly that of
J . T . Lang, was demonstrated in the Riverina Movement, but the
Movement's unsuccessful drive for secession did not still
farmers ' demands for more government aid .
In the third section the evolution and impact of
Federal and State government relief measures is traced.
Although few farmers made use of the State's legislation, it
appears to have assisted them to remain in production:
population and bankruptcy data reveal no large scale dispossession
by creditors. The turning point in the farmers' battle with
seasonal vagaries and the burden of debt appears to have been
in the mid 1930s. Federal funds for debt adjustment made the
reduction of debt more likely, and a poor season appears to
have led farmers to accept that there would be no immediate
economic recovery.
In the latter half of the 1930s renewed local
agitation and political pressure eventually brought a government response. Farmers were encouraged to leave the
land, there'by making the farms of those who remained
economically more viable .