Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Fire as an Economic Disincentive to Smallholder Rubber Planting in Imperata Areas

dc.contributor.authorMenz, Kenen_AU
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Katieen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2002-10-29en_AU
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T13:07:05Zen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:52:50Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T13:07:05Zen_AU
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:52:50Z
dc.date.created1997en_AU
dc.date.issued1997en_AU
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on research conducted in the Imperata project at CRES. Land infested with Imperata cylindrica has traditionally been regarded as being of low productivity. Recent research has shown tree growing to be an option for the Imperata areas of Southeast Asia. In this context, fire is seen as a major constraint. Rubber is one tree that is successfully grown in Imperata areas by many smallholders. In this paper, the physical impacts and private economic costs of fire associated with rubber planting are examined. Also, an aspect of the social costs of fire control are examined - in particular, the costs associated with the risk of fire spreading from one farm to another. These social benefits are not usually factored into private decisions regarding fire control, and thus may result in fire control, and tree plantings, being below the desirable level. A simple conceptual model of fire in Imperata areas is presented. This `fire model' is then incorporated within an existing bioeconomic model of a smallholder rubber agroforestry system involving Imperata. In the latter model, rice is initially the understorey to rubber followed after two years, by Imperata. The geographical focus of the study is South Sumatra, Indonesia. Much of the empirical data which was used to calibrate the model is from the Palembang region.en_AU
dc.format.extent66374 bytesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/40907
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherCanberra, ACT: Ecological Economics Programme, Center for Resource and Environmental Studies (CRES), The Australian National Universityen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Ecological Economics: No.9703en_AU
dc.subjectfireen_AU
dc.subjecteconomic disincentiveen_AU
dc.subjectImperata cylindricaen_AU
dc.subjectrubber plantingen_AU
dc.subjectImperataen_AU
dc.subjectSoutheast Asiaen_AU
dc.titleFire as an Economic Disincentive to Smallholder Rubber Planting in Imperata Areasen_AU
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationEEP, CRESen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_AU
local.description.refereednoen_AU
local.identifier.citationmonthmaren_AU
local.identifier.citationyear1997en_AU
local.identifier.eprintid666en_AU
local.rights.ispublishednoen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
eep9703.pdf
Size:
64.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format