Learnability and Pedagogical Implication: An Acquisition-Based Evaluation of English Textbooks in China
Abstract
This study conducts an acquisition-based evaluation of four
primary-school English textbook series used on a nationwide scale
in mainland China. The evaluation aims to determine whether the
sequencing of grammatical structures in the four textbook series
is compatible with the L2 learning sequence stipulated in
Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998, 2005).
L2 acquisition cannot occur without input, and textbooks serve as
the primary form of input for learners, especially in the foreign
language context. In China, learners of L2 English have little
natural exposure to the target language. Textbooks are the main
source of L2 exposure for L2 learners. Therefore, it is essential
to write textbooks based on language acquisition principles.
Currently, the majority of evaluation studies on textbooks
address the potential value of textbooks, the actual effects of
textbooks on users, and the authenticity of dialogues or
sufficiency of pragmatic information in the textbooks. Only a few
studies adopt the SLA theories to evaluate textbooks. My study
attempts to examine four sets of English textbooks from a SLA
theoretical perspective, focusing on the sequencing of English
morphology and key sentence structures.
The analysis began by documenting the morphological and
structural items that the textbooks introduced as teaching
objectives. These items were then categorized according to the
PT-based L2 procedures for English. The outcome was compared to
the sequence of the corresponding items in the processability
hierarchy (Pienemann, 1998, 2005).
The results show that there is partial agreement between the
sequencing of grammatical structures as teaching objectives in
the four textbook series and the PT-based processability
hierarchy. In general, the sequencing of grammatical structures
in the initial stages is consistent with the learning sequence of
L2 English stated in PT. However, several structures in the
intermediate or high stages are taught in a deviant way against
their sequencing in PT.
The deviant grading of the high-stage structures in the textbooks
is possibly associated with the theme-based guidelines adopted in
the textbooks. It appears that concerns with the utility of
grammatical structures in a given context takes precedence over
concerns for the natural L2 development. A number of suggestions
are offered to textbook writers in terms of the role of input,
the learners’ developmental readiness, and the issue of
heterogeneity in L2 classrooms.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description