Metropolitan planning : economic rationalism and social objectives
Loading...
Date
Authors
Self, Peter
Metropolitan Planning in Australia 2: Social Costs and Benefits Conference
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Urban Research Program. Research School of Social Science. Australian National University.
Abstract
The paper covers a familiar subject-the basic value of the market system
and the major defects of markets such as their instability and inequality.
Peter Self contends that planners have contributed to the stabilisation of
urban systems, but have often added to the inequalities of the market system
rather than reducing them.
Self examines the basic criteria of welfare economics and argues thal there
is no necessary disrepancy between economic and social goals. The ultimate
economic goal is to maximise the sum of individual welfare and this goal
logically includes unpriced, as well as priced, aspects of individual welfare.
Planners' possible contributions to the creation of a 'liveable city' and a
better 'quality of life' are shown to be substantial but have still to be realised
in Australia. He then deals with the apparent conflict between 'efficiency'
and 'equity', arguing that more equality in the distribution of welfare (of all
kinds) would in fact tend to maximise the sum total of welfare. The reasons
why many economists shy off this conclusion are discussed.
The way in which market inequalities are, in fact, augmented by the
economic structure of the big, modern city is analysed. Self argues that an
effective and just planning strategy requires a combination of substantive
goals (which benefit society generally) and egalitarian goals (which
discriminate in favour of poor and disadvantaged groups.) The author then
applies this general approach to the metropolitan strategies recently
prepared for four large Australian cities. He reviews urban consolidation
policy, centres' policy, environmental policy, and State development
policies from this standpoint.
In the paper's concluding sections, the author deals briefly with the scope of
metropolitan planning and its relation to social justice strategies, and with
some current economic and ideological objections against a wider role for
planning. He then summarises future directions for planning.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Australia (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU)
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description