Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The Changing Morphology of Indoor Ecosystems in the Twenty-first Century Driven by Technological, Climatic, and Sociodemographic Forces

dc.contributor.authorStokols, Danielen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-15T03:50:18Z
dc.date.available2019-03-15T03:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.description.abstractThe majority of humans reside in urban regions and spend most of their time in indoor environments such as residential, educational, occupational, transportation, and health-care facilities. Interior settings affect occupants’ health and behavior through their design, and chemical, microbial, and social features. The initial portion of this paper describes ecological psychologists’ conceptions of indoor environments as self-contained and distinctly bounded ecobehavioral systems, with evidence for the behavioral and health effects of homes, workplaces, and other kinds of indoor ecosystems cited. The ensuing sections examine contemporary changes in the structure and functioning of indoor ecosystems propelled by the digitalization of society, global climate change, and sociodemographic shifts toward population aging, income inequality, and anti-immigrant views in many countries. Transdisciplinary action research is needed to understand and manage rapid changes in indoor ecosystems, as evidenced by the increasing permeability of their spatial and temporal boundaries, modifications of their structural features, and shifts in the distribution of certain categories of settings within host communities. Effective collaboration among academic and nonacademic partners spanning diverse fields and multiple environmental scales is likewise essential for developing broad-gauged solutions to enhance the healthfulness and sustainability of indoor ecosystems as they continue to evolve in future years.en_AU
dc.format.extent1 vol.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1074-4827en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/157149
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherANU Press
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons licence (CC BY-NC-ND; creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)en_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceHuman Ecology Reviewen_AU
dc.subjectchanging structure prevalence of indoor behavior settingsen_AU
dc.subjectcybersphereen_AU
dc.subjectglobal climate changeen_AU
dc.subjectsociodemographic trendsen_AU
dc.subjecttransdisciplinary action researchen_AU
dc.titleThe Changing Morphology of Indoor Ecosystems in the Twenty-first Century Driven by Technological, Climatic, and Sociodemographic Forcesen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access via publisher websiteen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage40en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationCanberra, ACT, Australiaen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage25en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume24en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.22459/HER.24.02.2018.02en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://press.anu.edu.au/en_AU
local.type.statusMetadata onlyen_AU

Downloads