Intervention in civil strife and international order
Abstract
The intention of this thesis is to examine the
significance of intervention in civil strife for international
order. Intervention is defined here in purely descriptive
terms as a particular sort of international activity. It
is distinguished not by its legality or illegality but by
observable characteristics which, though complex, are
independent of moral, political or legal values. Such a
definition differs from the attitudes to intervention that
states normally take. Some wish to define intervention as
invariably wrong; others see it as justified on occasions,
whether frequent or rare.^ The procedure here will be to
propose a definition of intervention in civil strife and
then to inquire into the circumstances in which it may be
considered desirable or undesirable. The criteria of
judgement are provided by the fundamental rules of
international society which take the form of normative
expressions about how states ought to behave. Unlike a
system of states, which is defined simply by the interactions
between them, the society of states may be said to interact
for certain common purposes. The basic rules of that
society are those which are essential to the achievement of
such purposes, and the measure of order among states is the
extent to which these rules are upheld and their purposes
realized. Order is not simply the absence of intervention.
The task is to ascertain, as far as is possible, the
circumstances in which intervention in civil strife accords
or does not accord with these rules; and to give some
account of the extent to which such intervention contributes
to or detracts from order in the contemporary world.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description