Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Productivity, net returns and efficiency: land and market reform in Vietnamese rice production

dc.contributor.authorKompas, Tomen_AU
dc.contributor.authorChe, Tuong Nhuen_AU
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Ha Quangen_AU
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hoa Thi Minhen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T05:53:38Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-20T06:03:47Z
dc.date.available2010-10-14T05:53:38Zen_US
dc.date.available2010-12-20T06:03:47Z
dc.date.issued2009en_AU
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:46:52Z
dc.description.abstractExtensive land and market reform in Vietnam has resulted in dramatic increases in rice output over the past thirty years. The land and market reforms in agriculture were pervasive, moving the system of rice production from commune-based public ownership and control to one with effective private property rights over land and farm assets, competitive domestic markets and individual decision making over a wide range of agricultural activities. The effect of this reform period and beyond is detailed with measures of total factor productivity (TFP), terms of trade and net returns in rice production in Vietnam from 1985 to 2006. Results show that TFP rises considerably in the major rice growing areas (the Mekong and Red River Delta areas) during the early years of reform, and beyond, but also that there is clear evidence of a productivity “slow-down” since 2000. The differences over time and by region speak directly to existing land use regulations and practices, suggesting calls for further land and market reform. To illustrate this, additional frontier and efficiency model estimates detail the effects of remaining institutional and policy constraints, including existing restrictions on land consolidation and conversion and poorly developed markets for land and capital. Estimates show that larger and less land-fragmented farms, farms in the major rice growing areas, and those farms that are better irrigated, have a greater proportion of capital per unit of cultivated land, a clear property right or land use certificate and access to agricultural extension services are more efficient.en_AU
dc.format.extent38 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.citationKompas, T., Che, T.N., Nguyen, H.Q. & Nguyen, H.T.M. (2009). Productivity, net returns and efficiency: land and market reform in Vietnamese rice production. International and Development Economics Working Paper 09-02. Canberra, ACT: Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University.en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0023-7639en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10440/1153
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenancePermission granted by Crawford School to archive their papers and make them publically available - permission given by Director, Research, Crawford School of Economics and Government, in email dated 30/10/10en_AU
dc.publisherCrawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National Universityen_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.sourceLand Economicsen_AU
dc.source.urihttp://www.crawford.anu.edu.au/degrees/idec/working_papers/IDEC09-02.pdfen_AU
dc.titleProductivity, net returns and efficiency: land and market reform in Vietnamese rice productionen_AU
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage495en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationCanberra, ACT, Australia
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage478en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKompas, Thomas, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChe, Nhu-Tuong, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNguyen, Hoa, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationNguyen, Ha Quang, Vietnam Forestry Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu9402470en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidE6821en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidunknownen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidunknownen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140201 - Agricultural Economicsen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140299 - Applied Economics not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo910210 - Productionen_AU
local.identifier.absseo910404 - Productivity (excl. Public Sector)en_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB1436
local.identifier.citationvolume88
local.identifier.doi10.1353/lde.2012.0036
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84867379647
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.crawford.anu.edu.auen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kompas_Productivity2009.pdf
Size:
492.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format