Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

On Being Indecisive: Functionalist Antecedents and Processes in the Psychology of Indecision and Indecisiveness

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Tang, Stephen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This thesis advances a psychological model of indecision and indecisiveness by way of a functionalist approach to decision-making. Understanding how and why people have difficulty making decisions requires looking beyond the content and outcomes of a decision problem. It requires identifying the multiple motivations, expectations and experiences of the decision-maker. The first part of the thesis is a metatheoretical and theoretical exposition to make room for the functionalist underpinnings of indecision and indecisiveness. This begins with recognising that decision-making is a psychological activity over time which involves the exercise of the decision-maker’s agency. After reviewing the limited literature on indecision and indecisiveness, a new model is proposed based on three functional motivations of a decision-maker: (i) attaining good decision outcomes, (ii) managing the demands of a good decision-making process, (iii) and being a good decision-maker. Successfully realising each of these motivations can be difficult, resulting in indecision. Indecision is compounded when multiple motivations collide within a decision event. The present model posits that each decisional motivation corresponds to a distinct indecision process, namely outcome indecision, process indecision and self-presentation indecision. These indecision processes are influenced by aversive and avoidant forms of indecisiveness, which draw attention to different aspects of a decision and the decision-maker. Three studies tested and refined this model. Study 1 provided factor-analytic evidence of aversive, avoidant and ruminative dimensions of indecisiveness using a composite trait measure. The characteristics and effects of each dimension were evident when correlated against other personality constructs and measures relating to a recalled recent experience of indecision. Study 2 used two contrasting decision-making tasks to elicit process indecision and account for some antecedents of outcome indecision. Behavioural, process-tracing, self-report and psychophysiological data indicated that such indecision could be expressed in both approach and avoidant ways depending on the interaction between indecisiveness, appraisals of the task and self-regulatory capacity. Study 3 was a novel behavioural decision-making task in which participants’ attention was drawn to different aspects of being a decision-maker. In addition to replicating key previous findings, the results showed evidence of self-presentation indecision when participants’ identity as an indecisive person was salient. Finally, the thesis considers the implications of the model for the conceptualisation and treatment of clinical indecision. A proposal for the transdiagnostic psychological treatment of indecision is set out based on the functionalist model.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads