The theoretical base for the ATO compliance model
Loading...
Date
Authors
Braithwaite, Valerie
Job, Jennifer
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Centre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI), Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University
Australian Taxation Office
Australian Taxation Office
Abstract
The ATO Compliance Model was developed by the Cash Economy Task Force
between 1996 and 1998 (Commonwealth of Australia, 1998a). The model drew on two
theoretical frameworks from regulation – responsive regulation (Ayres and Braithwaite,
1992; Braithwaite, 2002 based on fieldwork described in Braithwaite, 1985; Grabosky
and Braithwaite, 1986) and motivational posturing (Braithwaite, Braithwaite, Gibson, and
Makkai, 1994; Braithwaite, 1995). Both theoretical frameworks are grounded in data
from surveys, observations and interviews relating to regulators and regulatees in action.
These data, collected in different settings, were interpreted against a background of social
science theory, most notably reactance theory (Brehm and Brehm, 1981), procedural
justice theory (Tyler, 1990, 1997), self-categorisation theory (Turner, 1987), defiance
theory (Sherman, 1993) and reintegrative shaming theory (Braithwaite, 1989; Ahmed,
Harris, Braithwaite and Braithwaite, 2001). Ideas and data were then pulled together to
develop the theoretical frameworks described in more detail below.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description