Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Supply response of sugarcane farmers in Thailand

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Pinyopusarerk, Maneerat

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Sugar is one of the major exports of Thailand and sugarcane is the most important raw material used in producing sugar. Time series data for 8 years from 1957/68 to 1974/75 were analysed to estimate a supply response function for sugarcane farmers in 4 regions of Thailand, viz. Central, Eastern, Northern and North-eastern regions. A priori, farmers' decisions on the sugarcane planted area were expected to be influenced by relative expected profitability per rai of sugarcane, the level of rainfall at the sowing period, the influence of the Sugarcane Farmers' Association, the activity of quotaman, the cost of inputs, and Government intervention. Relative expected profitability per rai is defined as expected price per tonne of sugarcane times its expected yield per rai (i.e. gross return) divided by the product of expected price per tonne of the competing crop and its expected yield per rai. Expected yield was found by regressing yield over time. Farmers' price expectation formations were specified using the Nerlovian Expectation and the Naive models. Due to unavailability and unreliability of data, many variables were inevitably dropped. The general model was simplified and adjusted. Good fits, therefore, were not obtained. However, it was found from the study that farmers in two regions, viz. Eastern, and North-eastern regions have an inelastic supply response function. It is only farmers in the Northern region which have an elastic supply response function ranging from 2.00 to 5.52 depending on differing expectation models and the use of differing techniques. Policy recommendations, consequently, were not made because of the inadequacy of the results obtained.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

abcd