The power of small : the diplomacy of small states in regional organisations

Abstract

How can small states influence the conflict management activities of regional organisations? The conventional wisdom in the literature of International Relations holds that small states lack the ability to shape the preferences of other actors. In recent years, some small-state scholars have challenged this view. They argue that some small states make bold initiatives and succeed in influencing institutions like the European Union. These studies are, however, mostly single-country case studies, focusing almost exclusively on European small states in the European Union. They do not, therefore, reveal what is unique to that case, and what can be generalised to small states in other parts of the world. Moreover, these studies have not examined adequately international-level factors such as the role of the dominant power in the regional organisations, in helping or hindering the initiatives of the small states. This study aims to fill that gap. It seeks to understand the national and international-level factors that determine the abilities of small states to influence the conflict management activities of regional organisations. The study also seeksto expand our understanding of small-state diplomacy by examining non-European small states. It analyses seven case studies involving six small states in five regional organisations. It is one of the first scholarly attempts to understand the factor - both at national and international levels - that determine the abilities of small states to exert influence in regional organisations. In doing so, it contributes to the study of diplomacy in general, and the diplomacies of small states in particular. The thesis examines the seven case studies with the help of a theoretical framework that identifies five factors as necessary for small states to be able to exert influence in conflict management activities of regional organisations. The factors are: small states' credibility, norm entrepreneurship, diplomatic resilience, the institutional mechanisms within the regional organisation, and the role of the regional power. The empirical analysis of the case studies shows that all five factors are necessary for small states to exert influence. There is evidence from the case studies to suggest that the role of regional power is a necessary, but not a sufficient condition for determining whether small states can exert influence in regional organisations. Second, small states could influence the shaping of a regional power's preferences if the former's diplomacy is sufficiently resilient. Small states derive their diplomatic resilience from the strength of the foreign policy bureaucracy, the persuasive power of diplomats, and niche diplomacy. Third, small states exert influence by pursuing norm entrepreneurship in regional organisations. Fourth, small states' ability to influence depends on whether the institutional mechanisms within the regional organisation allow sufficient space for these states to manoeuvre. Finally, small states can exert influence if they have credibility derived from a non-threatening foreign policy posture and from persistent activism and expertise in a given issue. The findings of this study reveal that with the right policies, small states can increase their diplomatic resilience. For size alone does not determine destiny; persuasive diplomacy does. - provided by Candidate. Show more