Illiberal Transitional Justice: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia

Abstract

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) was created by an agreement between the Cambodian government and the United Nations with a mandate to put Khmer Rouge leaders on trial for crimes committed during their 1970s regime. Judicial responses, such as the ECCC, to periods of mass violence have been termed transitional justice since the 1990s. Although the definitions of transitional justice are very broad, the explanations and analyses offered by the literature contain implicit assumptions that transitional justice is being implemented as part of a transition towards liberal democracy. In this thesis I use the case of Cambodia to challenge these assumptions and propose a new category of illiberal transitional justice. Before the creation of the ECCC began, the Cambodian government had spent nearly two decades shaping the narrative of the Khmer Rouge period to suit its political interests. When the United Nations became involved in discussions for a Khmer Rouge tribunal the government was concerned to protect itself and this narrative. The negotiations took place over six years where both sides competed for control over the mechanism. This competition for control was then transferred to the national and international sides of the court once the ECCC became operational. Although all actors involved in the ECCC frequently invoked the language of procedure, in practice procedures were easily dismissed if they were inconvenient. Given this discussion of the ECCC’s establishment and operation, I consider the court in light of the expectations of the transitional justice literature. The ECCC was not adhering to the assumed outcomes regarding ending impunity, building the rule of law, or strengthening democracy, and instead these changes were being actively impeded by the Cambodian government. Rather than pursuing these expected goals the Cambodian government was using the ECCC to enhance its international legitimacy and to strengthen its domestic political control. I argue that the ECCC should be considered an archetypal example of illiberal transitional justice. Cases of illiberal transitional justice sit on a spectrum between liberal transitional justice, which currently dominates the literature, and cases of transitional justice employed by repressive regimes, which are largely ignored in the literature. The ECCC, as a case of illiberal transitional justice, sits on the boundary between legitimacy and illegitimacy. The court maintained its legitimacy through the ongoing UN involvement and adherence to the language of procedure, but this legitimacy was challenged by the political interference of the Cambodian government in the court’s operation. Illiberal transitional justice is a different conception of what the rules are, how important they are, and when they are important. In this thesis I challenge existing assumptions and analyses of transitional justice to create a more nuanced understanding of how and why transitional justice mechanisms are employed. Show more