Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Labour regime and industrialisation in the knowledge economy : the Japanese model and its possible hybridisation in other countries

dc.contributor.authorTremblay, Diane-Gabrielleen_AU
dc.contributor.authorRolland, Daviden_AU
dc.date.accessioned2003-10-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T08:26:18Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:42:46Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T08:26:18Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:42:46Z
dc.date.created2000en_AU
dc.date.issued2000en_AU
dc.description.abstractGiven the perceived role of Japanese Human Resources Management policies and labour regimes in fostering innovation and industrialisation, it is interesting to see whether these practices have or will spread beyond Japan. While the recent financial difficulties in Japan have brought this model into question, Japanese-style organisational methods and labour regime in human resources management have not been totally discredited. Many elements of the innovation system are still considered a source of strength and continue to provide a reference for future industrial development. This article starts by explaining the different dimensions of what has become known as the Japanese innovation system, highlighting the elements which appear pertinent in the modern economy. It then assesses which dimensions of the Japanese model have been retained in a foreign setting, Canada, and how Canadian emulators of the Japanese model compare with Japanese firms. The observation leads to a conclusion of continuity and transition. While many quality-oriented Canadian firms have moved towards the Japanese model of innovation and production organisation, these practices seem to have been substantially adapted to the local context.en_AU
dc.format.extent1 vol.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/40400
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherAsia Pacific Pressen_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyrighten_AU
dc.subjectHRMen_AU
dc.subjecthuman resources managementen_AU
dc.subjectJapanese innovation systemen_AU
dc.subjectCanadaen_AU
dc.subjectlabour regimesen_AU
dc.subjectindustrialisationen_AU
dc.subjecteconomyen_AU
dc.subjectrecruitmenten_AU
dc.subjectemploymenten_AU
dc.titleLabour regime and industrialisation in the knowledge economy : the Japanese model and its possible hybridisation in other countriesen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.description.refereedyesen_US
local.identifier.citationnumber7en_US
local.identifier.citationpages1-16en_US
local.identifier.citationvolume1en_US
local.identifier.citationyear2000en_US
local.identifier.eprintid2100en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-7-tremblay.pdf
Size:
84.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format