Skill at work: ideas about skill and their impact on occupational associations in Australia, c.1879-1920
Abstract
This thesis attempts to relate the behaviour and
policy of occupational associations to skill, skill
hierarchies, and ideas about skill through historical
analyses of two organisations, the Victorian Operative
Bootmakers' Union and the Victorian Institute of Engineers.
It is broadly set within the framework of rational choice
theory.
Consideration of previous literature on the nature and
existence of workforce skill led to the conclusion that a
study of the relationship between ideas about skill and
behaviour would be more fruitful than a study of skill
itself. An analysis of the history of apprenticeship is
provided as a context for the constraints within which such
ideas were formed, as well as for its usefulness in
illustrating the fact that definitions of skill alter and
are subject to constant redefinition and battles for
control.
The Victorian Operative Bootmakers' Union (VOBU) was
formed in 1879, when factory production was taking over the
old craft of bootmaking. Its members sought to promote a
policy whereby the journeyman bootmaker's independence, his
reward for skill, could be exercised within the new
constraints of factory production. Independence came to be
seen as hinging on the maintenance of piecework, a relic of
the pre-factory days; and union policy on outwork,
apprenticeship, and eligibility for membership was directed
to maintaining that independence. The battle to maintain
piecework had taken the VOBU from the Wages Boards to the
Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Court, where the drive to protect independence came to rely on the provision
of fair wage rates and compulsory apprenticeship. The
federal union formed to take the case to the Conciliation
and Arbitration Court went on to become a strong and
powerful organisation, which is still in existence today.
The Victorian Institute of Engineers (VIE) was formed
in 1883, primiarily by mechanical engineers. It later
became a general association catering for all but mining
engineers. Mechanical engineering was a new occupation
which drew its traditions and its personnel from the
different fields of the mechanic/millwright and the civil
engineer. These mixed origins, and the lack of firmly
identifiable traditions, led to confusion about the status
and identity of mechanical engineers. This confusion was
reflected in VIE policy on the education and training of
mechanical engineers, and reached a crisis when an
explicitly professional engineering body was formed in
1920. The main factor in VIE policy had been a belief in
the importance of practical skill for mechanical engineers,
but in other respects they were torn between the two ideals
of skilled craftsmanship and professionalism. Eventually
their rejection of official professionalism led to a split
in the Institute, with the mechanical engineers clinging to
a dying organisation while the civil engineers formed the
basis of the successful Institution of Engineers,
Australia.
I argue that the policies and behaviour of both these
very different organisations are explicable if we look at
their members' ideas about skill, and the way they acquired those ideas.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description