Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Rethinking criminology through radical diversity in Asian reconciliation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Braithwaite, John

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Australian National University, Regulatory Institutions Network (RegNet)

Abstract

Five cases of radical diversity in Asian reconciliation are used to suggest hypotheses for the kind of Asian relational theory building suggested in the contribution of Liu (2014) to this special issue: 1. Polynesian shame 2. Confucius and East Asian restorative justice 3. Indonesian and Timorese cultures of compliance with reconciliation agreements 4. Restorative justice hybridity in Pakistan and Afghanistan 5. Victim-initiated justice in Nepal.

Description

Citation

Braithwaite, J. 2014. Rethinking Criminology Through Radical Diversity in Asian Reconciliation. RegNet Working Paper, No. 43, Regulatory Institutions Network.

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI

Restricted until