Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Just a jobs program? CDEP employment and community development on the NSW far south coast

dc.contributor.authorJordan, Kirrily
dc.contributor.editorKirrily Jordan
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T01:19:20Z
dc.date.available2018-11-30T01:19:20Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.updated2020-12-27T07:43:13Z
dc.description.abstractDiscussions about Indigenous public policy often focus on remote areas. However, the role and influence of Commonwealth-funded programs like the Community Development Employment Projects (CDEP) in more densely settled Australia is no less profound. The far south coast of NSW was one of many regional areas where CDEP was closed in 2007. For some observers, the justification for this was sound: CDEP had never been intended for regional or urban locations and was not warranted because Indigenous residents of these areas lived within reach of mainstream labour markets. If CDEP was simply an employment program, it was argued, participants would do better without CDEP wages, getting support instead from mainstream employment services to find alternative jobs. The story on the far south coast, however, is much more complicated than this reasoning allows. Since CDEP closed there have been some gains in mainstream employment, but they are small. The reasons why more non-CDEP employment has not eventuated are complex and warrant further investigation if policymakers are serious about wanting to improve outcomes there. Moreover, the closure of CDEP has had other consequences for Koori communities that demonstrate the much broader role that CDEP played in the region. Local residents implicate CDEP’s closure in a range of ongoing concerns, including lost assets and services, closed businesses, reduced institutional capacity, fractured relationships and an enduring loss of morale. For  these reasons, many Aboriginal people on the far south coast still see their communities as worse off since CDEP’s decline.
dc.format.extent40 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-760460280en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/154024
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherANU Press
dc.relation.ispartofBetter Than Welfare? Work and Livelihoods for Indigenous Australians After CDEP
dc.relation.isversionofFirst Editionen_AU
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyright
dc.sourceBetter Than Welfare? Work and Livelihoods for Indigenous Australians After CDEP
dc.titleJust a jobs program? CDEP employment and community development on the NSW far south coast
dc.typeBook chapter
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access via publisher websiteen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage124en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationCanberra, ACT, Australiaen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage85en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationJordan, Kirrily, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidJordan, Kirrily, u4563680en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.description.refereedYesen_AU
local.identifier.absfor140219 - Welfare Economicsen_AU
local.identifier.absfor169902 - Studies of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Societyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9204672xPUB576en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.22459/CAEPR36.08.2016.04
local.publisher.urlhttp://press.anu.edu.au/en_AU
local.type.statusMetadata onlyen_AU

Downloads