Origins of the Weipa Shell Mounds
Abstract
The shell mounds at Weipa on the west coast of Cape York Peninsula are
thought by archaeologists to be among the world's largest prehistoric middens. The
mounds appear to be composed almost entirely of whole and fragmented shell valves of
the cockle Anadara granosa and artefacts have been recovered from them. Stone (1989),
however, proposed that the tall, steep-sided shell mounds were not built by shellfishing
Aborigines but by generations of mound-building Scrubfowl Megapodius r einwar dt.
This thesis aims to determine the tenability of the Scrubfowl hypothesis by first testing
the hypothesis of human origin. It then aims to establish a geographical and chronological
context in which to interpret the origins of the shell mounds.
From the literature it is evident that physical and biological processes of mound
formation are far more certain and universal than cultural processes. Cheniers and
barriers are common features of the world's coastlines and may form mounds through
quirks of sediment supply or erosion. Mound-building organisms include megapodes,
termites and ants, alligators and crocodiles, and fossorial rodents. Human occupation
mounds are distinguishable by architectural features and related cultural remains. Mounds
of doubtful human origin include the shell mounds of the Americas, Europe and
southeast Asia. These mounds have morphostratigraphic features which strongly suggest
that they are natural shoreline deposits, not massive shell middens. In the Andaman
Islands, New Caledonia and southeastern Australia there are also mounds considered
cultural in origin which may have been built by megapodes.
The hypothesis that the Weipa shell mounds are the result of repeated Aboriginal
shellfishing and occupation has been tested by dating a sequence of ten shells from the
Kwamter mound. The results show that most of the shells in the sequence are roughly the
same radiocarbon age. This casts serious doubt on the hypothesis of human origin. An
examination of the interior surfaces of a selection of shell valves was also undertaken to
determine if the shells contain any evidence for shellfish death offshore. Although
microborings likely to have been produced by endolithic cyanobacteria were recorded, it
is possible that these are post-depositional in origin as seven genera of cyanobacteria have
been cultured from the shells.
Mapping and auguring of coastal deposits at two locations along the Mission
River has revealed the natural origins of some of the Weipa shell mounds. Essentially,
the growth of the mounds reflects the development of the local chenier plains. Shell
mounds have formed where the sea has concentrated coarse Anadara granosa shell
whereas mounds composed of sand and gravel are present where these sediments
predominate. At Prumanung whole Anadara valves have been transported by wave-action
to the crest of the modem beach forming a coarse shell berm. At Uningan the prominent
shell mounds originated as small, isolated shell cheniers. The hypothesis that Scrubfowl
have transformed these natural shell deposits into tall, steep-sided mounds is tenable.
Habitats favourable to Scrubfowl are associated with each location.
Stanner's (1961) belief in the natural origins of the Weipa shell mounds is
supported by this thesis. Only the mound-building Scrubfowl is needed to explain their
unusual shapes and vertical exaggeration. The strong likelihood that these mounds are
natural shell deposits raises serious questions about basic principles of shell midden
archaeology. It is concluded that new methods for distinguishing between natural and
cultural shell deposits are needed.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description