Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Self-structure and Discrimination: Implications for Coping and Wellbeing

dc.contributor.authorSharpe-Davidson, Dora
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-23T23:27:56Z
dc.date.available2016-11-23T23:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractSubstantial research demonstrates the negative effects of discrimination on the psychological wellbeing of stigmatised groups. While the ultimate goal should be to reduce occurrences of discrimination, in the interim it is important to identify resiliency factors which may reduce the impact of discrimination. Given that being the victim of discrimination is likely to be experienced as a form of stress, research from the stress and coping literature can be used to inform knowledge in this area. In line with this literature, we examine self-concept structure as a resiliency factor. Self-concept structure refers to how people organise their self-beliefs and incorporates: (a) the number of different identities they subscribe to, (b) the degree to which they see their identities as similar or different, (c) the coherency and stability of self-beliefs and (d) the degree to which people can recognise and articulate their self-beliefs. In order to explore the role of self-concept structure in the context of discrimination we employ three surveys and two experiments, with a total of 577 participants from multiple stigmatised groups including women, international students and same-sex attracted people. Using regression models we examine two forms of self-structure (self-complexity and self-clarity) and whether they mediate and/or moderate the relationships between discrimination, stress, depression and anxiety symptomology. The findings indicate that having clear, coherent and stable self-beliefs may reduce the negative impact of discrimination on depressive symptomology. Furthermore, using a values based intervention from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy appears to be a means to reduce the impact of reading discriminatory articles on mood (a possible precursor to experiencing depressive symptoms). We conclude by discussing the clinical implications for the assessment of psychopathology in stigmatised populations and treatment targets to address the stigmatised self-concept.en_AU
dc.identifier.otherb40394566
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/110540
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectDiscriminationen_AU
dc.subjectself-structureen_AU
dc.subjectdepressionen_AU
dc.subjectself-complexityen_AU
dc.subjectself-clarityen_AU
dc.titleSelf-structure and Discrimination: Implications for Coping and Wellbeingen_AU
dc.typeThesis (PhD)en_AU
dcterms.valid2016en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationResearch School of Psychology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.supervisorReynolds, Katherine
local.description.notesauthor deposited 24/11/16en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.25911/5d7637491a5e2
local.mintdoimint
local.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sharpe-Davidson Thesis 2016.pdf
Size:
1.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: