Issue 1 (2009) pp. 107-112 - Debate on revolutionary organisation / Louis Proyect

dc.contributor.authorProyect, Louis
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Mick
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-22T00:50:56Z
dc.date.available2015-01-22T00:50:56Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractOne of the more rapidly growing groups on the left is Socialist Alternative. Unfortunately it would appear from a book by Mick Armstrong that they remain wedded to partybuilding conceptions that will inhibit future growth. It is understandable why such selfstyled Leninist formations would cling to counter-productive methodologies since the dead hand of tradition weighs heavily on any group seeking to establish itself as the avatar of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Trotsky. Perhaps a better approach would be to start with a fresh sheet of paper, an approach virtually ruled out for small propaganda groups obsessed with ‘revolutionary continuity.’en_AU
dc.format11 pagesen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1836-6597
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/12553
dc.rights© Louis Proyect 2009en_AU
dc.sourceMArxist Interventionsen_AU
dc.subjectrevolutionary organisationen_AU
dc.subjectLeninen_AU
dc.subjectleften_AU
dc.titleIssue 1 (2009) pp. 107-112 - Debate on revolutionary organisation / Louis Proyecten_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailsbma2@bigpond.net.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailInp3@panix.comen_AU
local.identifier.uidSubmittedByu5437951en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Proyect & Armstrong Debate on revolutionary 2009.pdf
Size:
41.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format