Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Possession in Lelepa, a language of Central Vanuatu

dc.contributor.authorLacrampe, Sebastienen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-19T23:41:17Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-20T06:04:03Z
dc.date.available2010-04-19T23:41:17Zen_US
dc.date.available2010-12-20T06:04:03Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThis thesis studies possession in Lelepa, a language from the Oceanic subgroup of Austronesian, spoken in Central Vanuatu. Investigating this particular feature of the language was achieved by collecting original data from Lelepa speakers. Language data is presented in the form of interlinearised examples taken from a corpus of texts and elicitation notes. Data was collected between 2006 and 2008 during fieldtrips to Lelepa and Mangaliliu. The core of the study is devoted to the possessive system of Lelepa. Like many other Oceanic languages, Lelepa has direct and indirect possessive constructions. This thesis shows that the direct possessive construction formally consists of a possessed noun to which a possessor suffix attaches. It encodes possession of semantic domains such as body parts, body products, reference kinship terms, items closely associated to the possessor and parts of wholes. Indirect possession is expressed by two distinct subtypes: the free and construct indirect constructions. The free indirect construction has pronominal possessors only, encoded by two distinct pronoun paradigms: general and part-whole possession pronouns. The former pronouns are used for possession of items that normally do not occur in the direct construction, and the latter are used for possession of parts of wholes. The construct indirect construction is characterised by the occurrence of either of two construct suffixes, -n or -g. The -n construct indirect construction has pronominal and nominal possessors, and the same semantic scope as the direct construction. The -g construct indirect construction has nominal possessors only, and the same semantic scope as the free indirect construction with general possession pronouns. This study also demonstrates that free variation between two possessive constructions, the direct construction and the -n construct indirect construction with pronominal possessors, occur in the language, although more work is needed to determine the scope of this feature.en_US
dc.formatxii, 133 p. : ill.en_US
dc.identifier.otherb73316982
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10440/1026
dc.provenancePermission granted to archive the thesis and make it publicly available.
dc.rightsAuthor owns the copyright.en_US
dc.subjectLelepaen_US
dc.subjectVanuatuen_US
dc.subjectpossessionen_US
dc.subjectpossessive constructionsen_US
dc.titlePossession in Lelepa, a language of Central Vanuatuen_US
dc.typeThesis (Masters)en_US
local.contributor.affiliationUniversity of the South Pacific
local.contributor.authoruidu4630671en_US
local.identifier.doi10.25911/5d7a2db62f2aa
local.mintdoimint
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lacrampe_MastersThesis2009.pdf
Size:
3.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format