Nervous Aesthetics: Cognitive Science, Literary Criticism and the Modern Novel

dc.contributor.authorBartlett, Michael James
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-12T06:52:00Z
dc.date.available2016-05-12T06:52:00Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractRecent movements in literature and the humanities have drawn upon insights gleaned from cognitive science. For some scholars this is viewed as a renaissance while for others it represents a dangerous trend towards reductionism. This project offers to mediate between these two perspectives, showing the promise and the pitfalls of this new interdisciplinary engagement. This thesis argues that the role of perceptual processes in relation to aesthetic engagement with literature is ripe for further study. The first two chapters present a combined literature review and methodology study. A detailed comparison of ‘cognitive poetics’ theorists Tsur and Stockwell in Chapter One is used to establish how cognitive science expands and revises literary criticism’s critical toolbox. Chapter Two focuses on the ‘neuroaesthetic’ theories of Ramachandran, Zeki and Barry, and from this develops a framework to discuss perceptual tension in literature. Following this, the thesis offers three case studies of modern authors whose literary style invites comparison with the current neurological understanding of perceptual and sensory processes. Chapter Three explores the notion that Jack Kerouac’s prose style in On the Road is musically inspired, and conducts a detailed comparison of the key features common to both language and music, including rhythm and tension. Chapter Four re-examines the idea of Impressionism influencing Virginia Woolf’s Mrs Dalloway, using evidence from cognitive science to fully articulate the connection between literary and visual Impressionism. Chapter Five is a study of Vladimir Nabokov’s prose, framed around a critical investigation of the significance of his synaesthesia to his writing. By exploring the broader nature of cross-modality and what it can inform us of the workings of the mind, this chapter shows how distinctive stylistic features influenced by cross-modality recur throughout Nabokov’s writing, and how he exploits cross-modality for aesthetic effect. Collectively these studies offer an account of how literary criticism infused with cognitive science can illuminate new understandings of aesthetic and perceptual engagement with literature.en_AU
dc.identifier.otherb3838906x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/101223
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectcognitive scienceen_AU
dc.subjectneuroscienceen_AU
dc.subjectneuroaestheticsen_AU
dc.subjectaestheticsen_AU
dc.subjectcognitive poeticsen_AU
dc.subjectTsuren_AU
dc.subjectStockwellen_AU
dc.subjectRamachandranen_AU
dc.subjectZekien_AU
dc.subjectLivingstoneen_AU
dc.subjectBarryen_AU
dc.subjectWoolfen_AU
dc.subjectKerouacen_AU
dc.subjectNabokoven_AU
dc.subjectLolitaen_AU
dc.subjectOn the Roaden_AU
dc.subjectMrs Dallowayen_AU
dc.subjectmusicen_AU
dc.subjectjazzen_AU
dc.subjectbebopen_AU
dc.subjectvisual arten_AU
dc.subjectimpressionismen_AU
dc.subjectsynaesthesiaen_AU
dc.subjectcross-modalityen_AU
dc.subjectphoneticsen_AU
dc.subjectrhythmen_AU
dc.subjecttensionen_AU
dc.subjectmetaphoren_AU
dc.titleNervous Aesthetics: Cognitive Science, Literary Criticism and the Modern Novelen_AU
dc.typeThesis (PhD)en_AU
dcterms.valid2015en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSchool of Languages, Linguistics and Literature, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailmichael.j.bartlett@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.supervisorSmith, Russell
local.contributor.supervisorcontactrussell.smith@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.identifier.doi10.25911/5d6515cc3ac40
local.mintdoimint
local.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_AU

Downloads

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bartlett Thesis 2015.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: