Flesh + blood : appropriation and the critique of Australian colonial history in recent art practice
Abstract
In the final two decades of the twentieth century Australian society was preoccupied with its
own history. So ubiquitous was this interest, that bookshops were crammed with popular
histories and historical fictions, TV networks aired historical re-enactments and devoted
whole series to its exploration and re-creation. In part, this increased awareness of history
was stimulated by the 200-year anniversary of white settlement simultaneously celebrated by
many non-Indigenous Australians and condemned by Indigenous protestors. Throughout the
1990s the debate over historical fact and its place within society- or the 'history wars' - took
centre stage moving beyond academic circles and into political and public discourse. At the
heart of this debate was what Bain Attwood called the 'new history', which incorporated the
hitherto absent perspectives of Indigenous Australians. This new version of history examined
discrepancies between dominant settler accounts of historical events and those provided by
Indigenous people, often in the form of oral testimony. A more vocal Indigenous population
also forced these new perspectives on Australian history into being, as increased calls for
land rights recognition and social justice became prominent.
The debate was so prominent that it permeated many areas of Australian society, the visual
arts provides one such example. This thesis is concerned with how the popularisation of
history was contended in the visual arts. I argue that Australian artists have used
appropriation as an effective means of engaging in a discourse on colonialism; of
communicating with the past, and of ensuring that that past remained a highly visible
concern of the present Through its reliance on existing images, appropriation enables artists
to condense the space between the quoted image and their new work. It therefore demands
that the quoted image be seen as a concern of the present. This strategy was implemented by
a significant number of Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian practitioners during the
last two decades of the twentieth century. Moreover, it provides an important point of
intersection between the artistic practice of Indigenous and non-Indigenous artists. Rather
than seeking to document the history of appropriation in Australia, this thesis is concerned
with highlighting how appropriation has become the basis of a critical commentary on
historical narratives of colonialism.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description