Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The arts of care in an asylum and a community 1925-2004: Kenmore Hospital, New South Wales and Canberra, the Australian Capital Territory

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Kordes, Doris

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This thesis examines the arts of care in an asylum in New South Wales (NSW) and a mental health community in the Australian Capital Territory in twentieth-century Australia, and describes and compares a range of governmental responses for responding to persons deemed to be in need of care. The thesis explores similarities between twentieth-century Australian care techniques and the key principles underpinning a ‘care system’ that was developed over 200 years ago. It proposes three twentieth-century care regimes, each one characteristic of a certain period: Herd Care, set in an asylum era that emphasised custodialism and confinement (1925-1958); Therapeutic Community, a period during which the asylum was reconfigured into a facilitative community (1959-1983); and Community Care, beginning around 1983, when NSW asylums were ‘rationalised’, their care techniques fragmented and outsourced in diverse settings generally referred to collectively as the mental health community. Some of the dynamics, continuities and ruptures in twentieth-century care regimes are analysed. Chapters describe the landscapes of care. They explore how environmental settings have been designed to reinforce the care regimes in which they are mobilised and how they ‘make up’ the possibilities for action of the subject of care. The dynamics of care between care providers and their recipients are examined. Some of the continuities and discontinuities of meanings associated with ‘family’ and ‘community’ in each of the care regimes are observed. Fieldwork findings are combined with the cultural narrative of psychiatric primitivism to consider why subjects have been deemed in need of care, at times in need of protection and training and at other times in need of discipline and restraint. The new possibilities for action that have emerged in Australian twentieth-century mental health governance are considered, when subjects of care have been encouraged to learn how to be free

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd