Moiety Names in South-Eastern Australia: Distribution and Reconstructed History
Loading...
Date
Authors
Koch, Harold
Hercus, Luise
Kelly, Piers
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ANU Press
Abstract
One of the distinguishing features of Australian social organisation is its
so-named classificatory system of kinship, whereby a given term may extend
to other people, including genealogically distant kin and even strangers.
For example, a father’s father’s brother’s son’s son may be called ‘brother’.
By extending the kinship terms through regular principles, everybody in the
social universe becomes kin of some kind, an arrangement called ‘universal
kinship’. So-called skin systems build on classificatory kinship by adding an
extra dimension in which a category name is applied to divisions of people,
and specific kinship relationships obtain between these social categories.
In contrast, kinship terms in Europe are applied only to members of
one’s immediate family, with fewer terminological distinctions made as
genealogical distance increases. The disjunction between these two social
models has been a source of misunderstanding ever since outsiders from
Europe began visiting and settling on the continent. In this chapter, we
plot the history of settler perspectives on Aboriginal social organisation with
special attention given to the rise of comparative kinship as an object of
scholarly interest in the West. Although Western scholars in the second half
of the nineteenth century became increasingly aware of the global diversity
of kinship systems, cross-cultural comparisons of kin systems would also give rise to overreaching and wrong-headed theories of unilinear human
‘progress’. The misanalysis of ethnographic descriptions from Australia laid
the foundations for social evolutionist dogmas; however, as we will show,
better documentation and analysis of Australian kinship systems would
later help to undermine these same ideologies. The twentieth century saw
a round rejection of social evolutionism within kinship studies, eventually
leading to new diachronic insights that took into account diffusion and
transformation. In turn, the ‘new kinship’ of the late twentieth century
began to recognise the enduring power of kinship to express and define
collective Indigenous identities.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Skin, Kin and Clan: The Dynamics of Social Categories in Indigenous Australia
Entity type
Access Statement
Open access via publisher website
License Rights
This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)