Soviet conceptions of coexistence and detente : a study in international theory
Abstract
The thesis is concerned primarily with the objective
credibility or realism of the official Soviet account of Peaceful
Coexistence, detente and related issues. This question of credibility
is regarded as methodologically prior to the question of the
reliability or otherwise of Soviet doctrine as an index of Soviet
intentions. But the concern of the current American debate on
Soviet doctrine has been overwhelmingly with the second question,
reflecting an apparent consensus among otherwise opposed groups that
Soviet doctrine does not provide a realistic perspective on the
problems of the contemporary great power relationship. The
epistemological and substantive assumptions implied in such a
consensus are considered and rejected; and it is argued that the
'schizophrenic' Soviet account, with its combination of a limited
commitment to stable great power coexistence and a continuing
expectation of revolutionary ferment in the Third World, does
provide a generally realistic perspective on the problems in question.
It is further argued that the process of adaptation to the unique
features of international relations is continuing in Soviet doctrine}
and that arguments which seek to demonstrate on doctrinal grounds
a clear Soviet rejection of stable great power coexistence are
untenable.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description