Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Procedural justice and the Australian Taxation Office: A study of scheme investors

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Murphy, Kristina
Australian National University. Centre for Tax System Integrity
Australian Taxation Office

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Centre for Tax System Integrity (CTSI), Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University
Australian Taxation Office

Abstract

During the 1990s, Australian taxpayers who invested in mass marketed tax schemes enjoyed generous tax breaks until the Australian Taxation Office (Tax Office) told them in 1998 that they abused the system. This paper examines the circumstances surrounding the decision of taxpayers’ to invest in scheme arrangements, and investors’ perceptions of the way the Tax Office dealt with the schemes issue. In addition, this paper explores why such a large number of investors have chosen to defy the Tax Office’s demands that they pay back taxes. Data were taken from interviews conducted with 29 scheme investors, and four non-investors, living in the Goldfields region of Western Australia. Consistent with the procedural justice literature, the findings revealed that many scheme investors chose to defy the Tax Office’s request that they pay back tax because they perceived the procedures that the Tax Office used to handle the situation as unfair. The implications of these findings are discussed and possible solutions for how the Tax Office might prevent a reoccurrence of the situation in the future are proposed.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description
abcd