Liability for air carriage under the Warsaw system in municipal courts
Abstract
This thesis examines the interpretation of the
Warsaw Convention and its amendments and supplement by
the courts of several countries. The Warsaw Convention
was chosen as the vehicle for comparison because it is
one of the oldest treaties unifying a certain area of
private law and consequently has a time span sufficient
to allow the appearance and development of problems in
the application of a uniform law convention and their
analysis in proper perspective.
The thesis attempts to explain why the courts of
the several countries examined often arrived at conclusions
which differed although they were applying a text which,
apart from the difficulties and errors of translation,
was identical. This examination reveals many problems
that arise in the application of uniform law conventions.
The underlying causes for these problems are explained
and analyzed.
The examination of the interpretations given to
the Warsaw Convention by the courts of the countries
examined and the analysis of the reasons for divergencies
in these interpretations enabled the isolation of a
number of factors which led to these differences. Finally,
the thesis offers a number of proposals for reducing the
extent of this divergence in the interpretation of present
and future uniform law conventions.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description