Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The doctrine of fundamental breach in contract law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Chin, Nyuk-Yin

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The doctrine of fundamental breach for which Karsales v. Wallis, Suisse Atlantique and, more recently, Photo Production v. Securicor Transport are key decisions, is one of the most discussed subjects in English contract law. It might be thought that all there is to be said about fundamental breach has already been said. This is not far from the truth if investigation of it merely continues the all too familiar debate whether the doctrine represents a rule of law rather than a rule of construction. On further scrutiny, however, there is still very much amiss in our understanding of fundamental breach. In particular, we do not seem to have really come to grips with what we shall see to be the crucial problem in fundamental breach, namely: when is a performer under a contract liable for his own misperformance notwithstanding the presence of an exception clause prima facie exempting him from liability?

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd