Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?

Date

Authors

Stern, David
Auld, Tony
Common, Mick
Sanyal, Kali K

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Canberra, ACT: Ecological Economics Program (EEP), Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies (CRES), The Australian National University

Abstract

The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis proposes that there is an inverted U-shape relation between environmental degradation and income per capita. Various explanations for this phenomenon have been put forward and some authors argue that important explanatory variables are omitted from conventional EKC estimates. Inclusion of these omitted variables is argued to increase the estimated "turning point" - the level of GDP per capita above which environmental degradation is declining. In this paper we use a new cross-section/time-series data base of sulfur emissions for a wide range of developed and developing countries. The methodology involves estimating EKCs for subsets of this database as well as for the sample as a whole. The results show that estimating an EKC using data for only the OECD countries, as has often been the case, leads to estimates where the turning point is at a much lower level than when the EKC is estimated using data for the World as a whole. The paper explores possible explanations of these results using Monte Carlo analysis, and other statistical tests.We conclude that the simple EKC model is fundamentally misspecified and that there are omitted variables which are correlated with GDP.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Working Papers in Ecological Economics (Ecological Economics Program (EEP), Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies (CRES), The Australian National University): No. 9804 (May 1998)

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description
abcd