Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

ASEAN : sovereign recalcitrant or security community architect?

dc.contributor.authorSoesilowati, Sartika
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-14T23:27:37Z
dc.date.available2016-11-14T23:27:37Z
dc.date.copyright2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-11-01T00:10:14Z
dc.description.abstractThis thesis demonstrates both the extent and the limits of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations' (ASEAN) ability to cooperate as a security community. The intent of the dissertation is to analyse the relevance and feasibility of preserving sovereign prerogatives within a framework of regional cooperation among the five core ASEAN member states: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines and Thailand. The study particularly reflects the tensions between the individual member-states' traditional sovereign prerogatives and the Association's stated ambition to develop into a regional security community. ASEAN's experience of community building has shown that the member-states still have insufficient will to act to reconcile the existing regional system with a capacity for deeper security cooperation because the predisposition of ASEAN members for Westphalian style sovereignty restricts this possibility. ASEAN can be characterised as a 'loose security community' with a judicious idea of power, institutions, interests and norms of 'we feeling' prevailing in the process of security community-building. The thesis argues that to build a security community that can succeed in Southeast Asia, the ASEAN member-states must rely on managing 'adaptable sovereignty'. Adaptable sovereignty allows the adjustment of sovereign prerogatives enabling compromise that provides the impetus toward community-building, but not to the point where the primacy of sovereignty is surrendered. Two case studies examine how ASEAN manages sovereignty to permit security cooperation. The first analyses combating terrorism in Southeast Asia, while the second investigates how three ASEAN states have cooperated to improve maritime security in the Malacca Straits. The case studies indicate that building a security community within ASEAN can only occur if the member-states do not have to substantially sacrifice their national sovereignty prerogatives, while simultaneously strengthening their sense of community over time. Current collaborative security efforts demonstrate that ASEAN's key member states are capable of striking a judicious balance between their respective sovereign prerogatives and community building efforts, but not to the point where the primacy of sovereignty is extinguished. This 'adaptable' form of sovereignty can be seen in their simultaneous protection of state-centric primacy, while also pursuing the higher levels of institutionalisation and interdependence necessary for effective security cooperation to develop.en_AU
dc.format.extentix, 315 leaves
dc.identifier.otherb2452209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/110273
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subject.lccUA833.5.S64 2009
dc.subject.lcshASEAN
dc.subject.lcshAsian cooperation
dc.subject.lcshNational security Southeast Asia
dc.subject.lcshTerrorism Prevention
dc.subject.lcshSoutheast Asia Politics and government
dc.titleASEAN : sovereign recalcitrant or security community architect?en_AU
dc.typeThesis (PhD)en_AU
dcterms.valid2009en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDepartment of International Relations, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studiesen_AU
local.contributor.supervisorTow, William T.
local.description.notesThis thesis has been made available through exception 200AB to the Copyright Act.en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.25911/5d7639d16611a
local.mintdoimint
local.type.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
b24522090-SOESILOWATI_FINAL.pdf
Size:
14.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format