Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Metropolitan planning in South Australia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Badcock, Blair
Metropolitan Planning in Australia Seminar

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Urban Research Program. Research School of Social Science. Australian National University.

Abstract

The South Australian Department of Environment and Planning decided to review metropolitan strategy in 1985, after neglecting strategic planning for almost a decade, when it became apparent that the stock of land set aside for urban expansion would be exhausted by the turn of the century. As part of this exercise, in the second half of 1987 details were released of: the metropolitan development programme for 1986-91 ; a long-term development strategy for metropolitan Adelaide; the recommendations of an inter-departmental working party on urban consolidation; and proposed changes to residential development policy within the metropolitan area. Subsequently , a group of consultants was commissioned to report on the social and community impact of the longer-term development options. Following a brief outline of the status of, and machinery presently available for , metropolitan planning in South Australia, the relationship between the development programming cycle and the formulation of longer-term, policy is considered. Three aspects of the revised urban strategy are examined in greater detail: (i) the setting of goals; (ii) the adequacy of the criteria used, including public sector versus 'private' costs, de-concentration , employment projections, transportation needs, and housing requirements; and (Hi) the role of consolidation in metropolitan strategy. The feasibility of implementing the strategy is taken up in the third section, especially the prospect for more compact residential development. The conclusion notes that although consolidation will undoubtedly lower public expenditure on urban infrastructure and the social costs associated with fringe development, it will be regressive in certain other respects.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/au/

Restricted until

Downloads

abcd