Poverty transitions in nonremote Indigenous households: The role of labour marker and household dynamics
Date
Authors
Venn, Danielle
Hunter, Boyd
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Canberra, ACT : Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR), The Australian National University
Abstract
Using data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in
Australia (HILDA) Survey, this paper estimates year-to-year poverty
entry and exit rates for Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals
living in nonremote areas of Australia. Indigenous Australians of
working age have a higher probability of entering poverty and a
lower probability of exiting poverty than non-Indigenous people.
Changes in household size are the biggest triggers of poverty
entry and exit for Indigenous people, accounting for almost 50%
of poverty entries and 40% of poverty exits. Changes in household
size are more prevalent for Indigenous than non-Indigenous
people, due partly to higher birth and partnering rates, and to
the greater proportion of Indigenous people who live in dynamic
extended-family or multifamily households. Indigenous people who
experience changes in household size have a greater likelihood of
entering poverty and a smaller likelihood of exiting poverty than
non-Indigenous people.
The labour market plays a prominent role in triggering poverty
transitions for Indigenous people. Among those in poverty,
increased exposure to the labour market (either by having
more household members working or higher labour earnings)
results in a 62% likelihood of exiting poverty, while reductions in
employment and labour earnings trigger around one-quarter of
poverty entries for Indigenous people. Changes in private income,
such as business and investment income, play a much smaller
role in triggering poverty entries and exits for Indigenous than non-Indigenous people, largely because Indigenous people get far less
of their income from such sources.
The results suggest that Indigenous poverty is likely to be more
persistent than non-Indigenous poverty, thus having a bigger negative
impact on wellbeing. Greater exposure to the labour market and more
access to other sources of private income are likely to reduce poverty
incidence among the Indigenous population, but the dynamics of
Indigenous households leave them at greater risk of persistent poverty,
all other things being equal.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description
Poverty transitions in nonremote indigenous households: the role of labour market and household dynamics