Skip navigation
Skip navigation

A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation

Zhao, Huaying; Ghirlando, Rodolfo; Alfonso, Carlos; Arisaka, Fumio; Attali, Ilan; Bain, David L.; Bakhtina, Marina M.; Becker, Donald F.; Bedwell, Gregory J.; Bekdemir, Ahmet; Hall, Damien

Description

Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Huaying
dc.contributor.authorGhirlando, Rodolfo
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorArisaka, Fumio
dc.contributor.authorAttali, Ilan
dc.contributor.authorBain, David L.
dc.contributor.authorBakhtina, Marina M.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Donald F.
dc.contributor.authorBedwell, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorBekdemir, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorHall, Damien
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:15:36Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/70478
dc.description.abstractAnalytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyright
dc.sourcePLOS ONE (Public Library of Science)
dc.titleA multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume10
dc.date.issued2015
local.identifier.absfor039904 - Organometallic Chemistry
local.identifier.absfor030503 - Organic Chemical Synthesis
local.identifier.absfor030701 - Quantum Chemistry
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB2324
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationZhao, Huaying, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
local.contributor.affiliationGhirlando, Rodolfo, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
local.contributor.affiliationAlfonso, Carlos, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas
local.contributor.affiliationArisaka, Fumio, Nihon University
local.contributor.affiliationAttali, Ilan, Tel Aviv University
local.contributor.affiliationBain, David L., University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
local.contributor.affiliationBakhtina, Marina M., The Ohio State University
local.contributor.affiliationBecker, Donald F., University of Nebraska-Lincoln
local.contributor.affiliationBedwell, Gregory J., University of Alabama at Birmingham
local.contributor.affiliationBekdemir, Ahmet, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
local.contributor.affiliationHall, Damien, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, ANU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage30
local.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0126420
dc.date.updated2015-12-11T07:18:46Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84930615100
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Zhao_A_multilaboratory_comparison_2015.pdf1.72 MBAdobe PDF


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator