Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Is there evidence of selection in the dopamine receptor D4 gene in Australian invasive starling populations?

Rollins, L.A.; Whitehead, Michael; Woolnough, Andrew P.; Sinclair, Ron; Sherwin, William

Description

Although population genetic theory is largely based on the premise that loci under study are selectively neutral, it has been acknowledged that the study of DNA sequence data under the influence of selection can be useful. In some circumstances, these loci show increased population differentiation and gene diversity. Highly polymorphic loci may be especially useful when studying populations having low levels of diversity overall, such as is often the case with threatened or newly established...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorRollins, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorWhitehead, Michael
dc.contributor.authorWoolnough, Andrew P.
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Ron
dc.contributor.authorSherwin, William
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:35:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1674-5507
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/69891
dc.description.abstractAlthough population genetic theory is largely based on the premise that loci under study are selectively neutral, it has been acknowledged that the study of DNA sequence data under the influence of selection can be useful. In some circumstances, these loci show increased population differentiation and gene diversity. Highly polymorphic loci may be especially useful when studying populations having low levels of diversity overall, such as is often the case with threatened or newly established invasive populations. Using common starlings Sturnus vulgaris sampled from invasive Australian populations, we investigated sequence data of the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4), a locus suspected to be under selection for novelty-seeking behaviour in a range of taxa including humans and passerine birds. We hypothesised that such behaviour may be advantageous when species encounter novel environments, such as during invasion. In addition to analyses to detect the presence of selection, we also estimated population differentiation and gene diversity using DRD4 data and compared these estimates to those from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA sequence data, using the same individuals. We found little evidence for selection on DRD4 in starlings. However, we did find elevated levels of within-population gene diversity when compared to microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA sequence, as well as a greater degree of population differentiation. We suggest that sequence data from putatively nonneutral loci are a useful addition to studies of invasive populations, where low genetic variability is expected.
dc.publisherCurrent Zoology
dc.rightsAuthor/s retain copyright
dc.sourceCurrent Zoology
dc.titleIs there evidence of selection in the dopamine receptor D4 gene in Australian invasive starling populations?
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolume61
dc.date.issued2015
local.identifier.absfor060200 - ECOLOGY
local.identifier.absfor060300 - EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
local.identifier.absfor060800 - ZOOLOGY
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB2151
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationRollins, L.A., University of New South Wales
local.contributor.affiliationWhitehead, Michael, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationWoolnough, Andrew P., Department of Agriculture and Food
local.contributor.affiliationSinclair, Ron, Biosecurity SA
local.contributor.affiliationSherwin, William, University of New South Wales
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage505
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage519
local.identifier.absseo970106 - Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T11:42:22Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-84929257299
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_Rollins_Is_there_evidence_of_selection_2015.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDF


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  17 November 2022/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator