Skip navigation
Skip navigation

Transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants

McGuire, William; McEwan, Peter

Description

Background: Enteral feeding tubes for preterm infants may be placed in the stomach (gastric tube feeding) or in the upper small bowel (transpyloric tube feeding). There are potential advantages and disadvantages to both routes. Objectives: To determine the effect of feeding via the transpyloric route versus feeding via the gastric route on feeding tolerance, growth and development and adverse consequences in preterm infants who require enteral tube feeding. Search strategy: The standard search...[Show more]

dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, William
dc.contributor.authorMcEwan, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:53:13Z
dc.identifier.issn1469-493X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/59257
dc.description.abstractBackground: Enteral feeding tubes for preterm infants may be placed in the stomach (gastric tube feeding) or in the upper small bowel (transpyloric tube feeding). There are potential advantages and disadvantages to both routes. Objectives: To determine the effect of feeding via the transpyloric route versus feeding via the gastric route on feeding tolerance, growth and development and adverse consequences in preterm infants who require enteral tube feeding. Search strategy: The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used. This included electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (up to March 2007) and of The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), and searches of the references in previous reviews including cross references. Selection criteria: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing transpyloric with gastric tube feeding in preterm infants. Data collection and analysis: Data were extracted using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of data using relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD). Main results: Data from nine trials were available. No evidence of an effect on short term growth rates was found: weight: WMD -0.7 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) -25.2, 23.8); crown heel length: WMD -0.7 mm/week (95% CI -2.4, 1.0); head circumference: WMD 0.6 mm/week (95% CI -0.9, 2.1). Longer term growth was reported in one study. There were not any statistically significant differences between the groups in the mean body weight or occipitofrontal head circumference at three months or at six months corrected age. None of the included studies provided data on neurodevelopmental outcomes. Transpyloric feeding was associated with a greater incidence of gastro-intestinal disturbance (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05, 2.09). There was some evidence that feeding via the transpyloric route increased mortality (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.36, 4.46). However, the outcomes of the study that contributed most to this finding were likely to have been affected by selective allocation of the less mature and sicker infants to transpyloric feeding. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of other adverse events, including necrotising enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and aspiration pneumonia was found. Authors' conclusions: No evidence of any beneficial effect of transpyloric feeding in preterm infants was found. However, evidence of adverse effects was noted. Feeding via the transpyloric route cannot be recommended for preterm infants.
dc.publisherThe Cochrane Library
dc.sourceCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
dc.subjectKeywords: aspiration pneumonia; body height; body weight; child development; child growth; clinical trial; enteric feeding; gastrointestinal symptom; head circumference; human; infant feeding; infant mortality; infant nutrition; intermethod comparison; intestine pe *Infant, premature; Enteral nutrition [*methods]; Humans; Infant, newborn; Pylorus; Randomized controlled trials as topic
dc.titleTranspyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants
dc.typeJournal article
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.citationvolumeOnline
dc.date.issued2007
local.identifier.absfor111502 - Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4167262xPUB481
local.type.statusPublished Version
local.contributor.affiliationMcGuire, William, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMcEwan, Peter, Ninewells Hospital
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.bibliographicCitation.issue3
local.bibliographicCitation.startpageCD003487.1
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage21
local.identifier.doi10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub2
dc.date.updated2015-12-10T07:31:56Z
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-44949214860
CollectionsANU Research Publications

Download

File Description SizeFormat Image
01_McGuire_Transpyloric_versus_gastric_2007.pdf203.36 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Open Research are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Updated:  19 May 2020/ Responsible Officer:  University Librarian/ Page Contact:  Library Systems & Web Coordinator